Part 2 of 2 : CASE STUDIES & APPENDICES.

 

A selection of case studies that give an indication of how the UK economy, its businesses and Its people have now been brought to their knees unchecked by those who have taken an Oath of Office to serve this country on behalf of its people.

 

Where duplication of the information in Part 1 is identified this underlines the importance and severity of the crimes and impact upon the United Kingdom and its people. These cases are still ongoing.

 

The Medical Fraud and Malpractice emanating from The Corona Virus Act 2020 will be addressed by professionals of The World Doctors Alliance.

 

http://worlddoctorsalliance.com/

 

This will be done through Common Law Court sessions, in the format of Nuremburg hearings. Those identified of having committed Criminal Acts will receive justice from Common Law Courts - We The People.

Case Study one (1) Circa 1972

FCO 30/1048. Unlawful Entry into the Common Market, EU

This Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) 30/1048 classified government document dated April 1971 remained secret until it was released under the 30 year rule.

 

It proves Heath's government knew the 1972 EEC Treaty would lead to the loss of sovereignty, and was therefore treason.

 

They had a stunningly accurate picture of the EU, which never was the European Economic Community (EEC), expecting Britain to be abolished after the turn of the century.

 

The authors, all civil servants or ministers, are very pro EU, their intent is clearly to conceal the loss of sovereignty. They understood perfectly Britain would be abolished.

 

In public, Heath's government lied in that the treaty would not affect our sovereignty.

 

This included Douglas Hurd, an active senior Conservative, who was both a liar and a traitor, a point put to him at the Conservative Conference in Blackpool.

 

He assured his connections in the legal profession would ensure he was never convicted.

 

Here are just a few of the damning sentences from FCO 30/1048.

Parliament controlled

11. Membership of the Communities will involve us in extensive limitations upon our freedom of action. For the first time Parliament is binding its successors.

 

Increasing loss of sovereignty

The loss of external sovereignty will however increase as the Community develops, according to the intention of the preamble to the Treaty of Rome "to establish the foundations of an even closer union among the European peoples ".

 

Small threats to sovereignty, like Burgess, Blunt and Maclean's selling secrets to the Russians, attract 30 year jail sentences. The penalty for actually loosing even small parts of it until 1998 was "to hang by the neck until dead."

 

King Charles 1st was executed for treason that was, by comparison, relatively minor.

 

Lord Haw Haw - “Germany Calling” - William Joyce, was hanged for treason on 3rd January

 

1946. Joyce’s efforts on behalf of Germany were small by comparison with Edward Heath’s.

 

A video interview of Harry Beckhough ex British Intelligence, GCHQ before his death confirms Edward Heath’s participation in the initiation of, transfer of power and sovereignty to an unelected Brussels operation funded by ex-Nazi spoils from the pillage and rape of Europe by German forces. Heath was fundamentally a German Spy. https://bit.ly/30OzqQy

 

This is further recorded by European witnesses in the publication Nazi Roots of The Brussels EU: Download PDF

 

 

 

Our law subservient

12. (ii) The power of the European Court to consider the extent to which a UK statute is compatible with Community Law will indirectly involve an innovation for us, as the European Court's decisions will be binding on our courts which might then have to rule on the validity or applicability of the United Kingdom statute. The writ of a foreign power is not allowed under the British Constitution, which Heath was breaking.

 

Predicting monetary and military union

18..but it will be in the British interest after accession to encourage the development of the Community toward an effectively harmonised economic, fiscal and monetary system and a fairly closely coordinated and consistent foreign and defence policy. If it came to do so then essential aspects of sovereignty both internal and external would indeed increasingly be transferred to the Community itself.

 

No withdrawal, sovereignty diminished

22. Even with the most dramatic development of the Community the major member states can hardly lose the "last resort" ability to withdraw in much less than three decades. The Community's development could produce before then a period in which the political practicability of withdrawal was doubtful. If the point should ever be reached at which inability to renounce the Treaty (and with it the degeneration of the national institutions which could opt for such a policy) was clear, then sovereignty, external, parliamentary and practical would indeed be diminished.

Disinformation

After entry there would be a major responsibility on HMG and on all political parties not to exacerbate public concern by attributing unpopular measures or unfavourable economic developments to the remote and unmanageable workings of the Community.

 

Transfer of the Executive

24 (ii) The transfer of major executive responsibilities to the bureaucratic Commission in Brussels will exacerbate popular feeling of alienation from government.

 

Erosion of sovereignty

24 (v) ...The more the Community is developed ... the more Parliamentary sovereignty will be eroded. ...The right... to withdraw will remain for a very considerable time. ...The sovereignty of the State will surely remain unchallenged for this century at least.

 

The EU Bureaucracy will rule

25. The impact of entry upon sovereignty is closely related to the blurring of distinctions between domestic Political and foreign affairs, to the greater political responsibility of the bureaucracy of the Community and the lack of effective democratic control.

 

The writers understanding of the future of the EU was bang on. They wanted the bureaucracy to take over from the democracy. The loss of sovereignty was desirable for them, legally traitors working deep inside our government.

 

With thanks to David Barnby. who obtained the original documents. David Noakes compiled and added additional intelligence for this document. Reference Materials:

 

https://1drv.ms/u/s!ApCwWYmI_p2Dhug4fANodZ2InB-S7w?e=1w5Yfn

 

When considering the late Master of the Rolls, Lord Chief Justice & Senior Law Lord, Baron Bingham of Cornhill’s explanation of the rule of law earlier in this document, that the law must be accessible, intelligible, clear & predictable, with rights & liabilities resolved by the application of Law not discretion, with the laws of the land applied equally to all, along with Ministers and public officers exercising their powers conferred on them fairly and without exceeding their limits.

 

Is it fair and reasonable given the undoubted will of the Sovereign people of the United Kingdom & its constituent Nations for the clearly evidenced Treason to be hidden for 30 years? A clear abuse of Parliamentary Sovereignty, and a clear example of Misconduct in public office at common law.

 

If it is fair and proper for a veteran of the British Army such as Dennis Hutchings to face an attempted murder investigation, for an incident in County Tyrone in 1974 following no less than Two previous investigations that had exonerated his name already. Yet the Heath administration who attempted to sell our country out with the beastliness of forethought has yet to answer these most grievous and Capital offences that they attempted to cover with the clear misuse of classification of public documents.

We are reporting this crime to yourself and you are therefore required in accordance with Honour, the Rule of Law & your Oath sworn duty as a Police Constable under Common Law schedule 4, sect 83 the Police reform Act 2002 to investigate these allegations and bring those incriminated before a Court De Jure, in a prompt and timely manner.

Case Study two (2) Circa 1999 & 2001 - Present

Lawful invocation on 23rd March 2001 of Article 61 Magna Carta 1215 & Nice Treaty

The Treaty of Nice was a direct result of the Heath administrations treasonous conduct within Case Study one (1) in this document.

 

The issues with the treaty of Nice are clearly highlighted within EXHIBIT A: The Barons Petition, attached to this document. EXHIBIT B is the translated text of Article 61 Magna Carta 1215.

 

This lawful invocation of Article 61 on the 23rd March 2001 has deposed (in law) Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, and rendered every act and statute of Parliament Null & Void, along with every organ of Government within the English Isles & the Commonwealth of Nations.

 

 Every action your Constabulary undertakes outside of the Common Law of the Land, is unlawful just as every act of Parliament since the date of invocation is that of a Government acting ultra vires.

 

 

1) A long range deception to overthrow the sovereignty of the English Isles, by controlling its currency and the powers to determine its own laws and affairs, was finalized by the Geo-political centre of the third Reich in Berlin 1942. This was done with the effect that should the Nazis lose the war, militarily, they should continue their plans for a European dictatorship economically, through corporatism (aka fascism), and political subversion. Their future shape of Europe is detailed in the seminars entitled 'Europaische wirtschaftsgemeinschaft' (public document worldcat. OCLC number 31002821). Translated into English as 'European Economic Community'. The chapter headings of this Nazi document were replicated almost verbatim in the 1992 Maastricht Treaty.

 

2) Since the end of the war diverse treasonous persons, groups and movements with this ideology, have conspired to build on this agenda which has become known as the European Union.

 

3) The involvement of the English Isles in this agenda began in 1948 with the formation of the European movement. This was a state funded Anglo-French pro-federal European lobbying body posing as a non-governmental grass-roots pressure group. The documentation evidencing these events are present on the discs FCO 10 30/48 public document worldcat. OCLC number 31002821) which can be viewed online.

 

4) The said movement is still publicly active today lobbying for total European integration and a European constitution.

5) The first move toward a federal Europe did not involve Britain directly, it was the signing of the treaty of Rome in 1957 by Germany, France, Italy, Belgium, Luxembourg and the Netherlands.

 

6) Meticulous research has uncovered a wealth of official, archived documents from the period 1970-72 which shows the blatant deceit perpetrated by the (so called) 'ruling elite' at the time. These documents have been released after the thirty year rule, which unlawfully hid them from the public. The Evidence file FCO 30/1048 has been within the public domain sinse 2002 and is easily accessible online.We strongly advise that you employ due dilligence and investigate the evidence within said file.
 

7) The English common law applies to all sovereign living breathing men and women and dictates that we are all born free to do whatever we choose for ourselves, provided we do not cause harm or loss to another's life, liberty or property, or their rights to life, liberty or property.
 

8) England, within the United Kingdom of Great Britain is a common law jurisdiction and provides the people with National Sovereignty. The English parliament has no lawful authority ever to breach, surrender land or transfer, even temporarily, the sovereignty of the people except when conquered in open warfare.
 

9) No man/woman (neither monarch, nor prime minister, nor any prelate, politician, judge or public servant) is above the common laws and customs of the English constitution.

 

10) The 1559 Act of Supremacy is a constitutionally arranged Act and stands un-repealed to this day. The Act includes the clause: “No foreign prince, person, prelate state or potentate hath or ought to have any jurisdiction, power, superiority, pre-eminence or authority, ecclesiastical or spiritual, within this realm”. 
 

11) Treason at common law is the offence of attempting to overthrow the lawful governance of a state to which the offender owes allegiance; or of betraying the state into the hands of a foreign power (EU/UN) which is high treason, and still punishable by death (see exhibit D).
 

12) Sedition at common law is the offence of overt conduct such as speech and organisation that is deemed by lawful authority as tending toward insurrection against the constitutionally established order. Sedition includes the subversion of a constitution and incitement of discontent (or resistance) to lawful authority.

13) The evidence presented in the Foreign and Commonwealth document 'FCO 30/1048 files, shows that the Heath Government of  the 1970's was well aware that an essential loss of national sovereignty would occur within thirty years with the passing of the European Communities Bill, and knew it would, in all likelihood, be rejected if brought to the people, which of course it was not. This in itself was an act of Sedition at common law by the Heath administration.

14) The passage of the European Communities Act on the 1st January 1973 established the principle that European law would always prevail over English Common law in the event of a clash, thereby overthrowing the supremacy of the English constitution, and was a criminal act of  High Treason at common law by the Heath administration.
 

15) The signing of the single European Act in 1986 reducing Britain's independent decision making powers further by extending majority voting in certain areas of policy making, was a criminal act of Treason at common law by the Thatcher administration.
 

16) The signing of the Maastricht Treaty in 1992, based on the original EEC Berlin document 1942, surrendering sovereign powers of the Queen in parliament to an unelected body in Europe, was an act of Treason at common law by the Major administration.
 

17) The signing of the Amsterdam Treaty in 1997 increased the European Unions powers for action at community level. This included further European integration in legislative, police, judicial, customs and security matters and strengthened Europol,  was an act of Treason at common law by the Blair administration.
 

18) With the full knowledge of this Treason and to escape future prosecution, the Blair government attempted to repeal the Treason legislation in section 36 of the 'Crime and Disorder Act 1998', also abolishing the death penalty for High Treason. This included the repealing of the Treasonable and Seditious Practices Act 1795. However, the crime of treason at common law still stands as common law has primacy and Tony Blair had no lawful authority to do so. Although this action by Tony Blair provides evidence of his criminal intent, the said 1795 Act was not created by way of a constitutionally arranged monarch, and is therefore not a lawful Act of parliament, subsequently it is used within this Notice under duress of circumstances.
 

19) The signing of the Nice Treaty in 2001 and the E.U. Constitution in 2004 were further acts of High Treason at common law by the Blair administration.
 

20) In an attempt to further protect themselves against criminal prosecution, the Blair government removed the word 'sovereignty' from the oath of office of constables in the police reform Act 2002 (section 83), and also modified the legislation to enable non British nationals to become police officers (section 82). These are acts of both Sedition and Treason at common law by the Blair administration.
 

21) The signing of the Lisbon Treaty in 2008 surrendered further control of policy making, including that relating to immigration and borders, was an act of Treason at common law by the Brown administration.

22) By surrendering further powers to the E.U. for direct taxation on the English people, and for allowing the EU to end the British rebate via further proposed treaties is evidence to prove that this was an act of Treason at Common Law by the Cameron administration.

23) By misleading the English people into voting to remain within or without of the treasonously established European Union, under the guise of 'Brexit', which granted authority to article 50 of the Lisbon treaty, whilst also allowing British armed forces to be under the control of the European Union (PESCO), and whilst threatening to bring EU law (corpus juris) into English law, were blatant acts of High Treason at common law by the May Administration.

24) For allowing United Nations troops onto the streets of England whilst continuing to usurp and deny the English constitution, whilst creating “laws” (rules) which lock-down the people under false pretences i.e, covid 19 and, seeking to create rules to test and inject the sovereign people against their will whilst furthering the goals of the UN's Agenda 21 – 2030, are despicable acts of high treason at common law by the Johnson administration.

25) The treasury department of the European Community has never allowed an independent audit by professional accountants of their books. One year of non- publication is a criminal offence. In fact, its financial accounts have been disapproved by the E.U's own court of auditors. This crime has already been reported to the UK Serious Fraud Office by former MP Ashley Mote. They are in possession of the evidence and have confirmed to him that the remittance of English taxpayer's funds into the hands of this criminal enterprise is, of course, a criminal offence.

Case Study three (3) Circa 2003 – Present

Insolvent Deutsche Bank Fraudsters – A litigation hypertext from shyreman.com

This covers the suppression of the precious metals market for 17 years with a view to defraud UK Banking clients. Mark Anthony Taylor was one of those clients who took a number of those banks to the Mercantile Courts in Birmingham. Case B40BM021. The Banks included Deutsche Bank, HSBC, UBS, RBS, Barclays, Citi Group and JP Morgan. Simon Brown QC effectively closed his case stating that Marks position was vexatious.

 

Deutsche Bank at a later date admitted the suppression of metals prices to a US Court to extract funds from clients and then cover up their activities. This in turn identified the rest of the defending Banks having committed the same fraud as they continue to do to this date.

 

This case brings into question the actions of several Political leaders and High Level Judiciary in the cover up of metals market fraud and money laundering impacting the Global Financial markets. British and Foreign investors.

 

The case covers money laundering, fraud and perjury and is recorded in some detail across the website http://www.shyreman.com/.

 

Marks intelligence gathering also links the appointment of Jes Staley as Barclays CEO by Jeffrey Epstein and the part he played in the metals rigging value suppression. Deutsche Bank incriminated Barclays as part of the New York disclosures. Jes Staley wrote to Mark to threaten him with a restraining order and hefty costs.

 

The outline of the core case is recorded in Gold Rigging and Bent Judges. A Video Analysis by Mark recorded in December 2016: https://bit.ly/3iGawZB: UBS Confess to Gold Rigging in New York January 2017: https://bit.ly/36JYYCk  and Deutsche Bank, ISIS and the EU Jigsaw : Jan 2017: https://bit.ly/34z7Xna

 

This video evidence contains pictures of documents that are within the http://www.shyreman.com/ website: http://www.shyreman.com/archive.php

 

Freedom of Information request F17-296

 

A freedom of investigation request to Parliament identifies that Parliament were NOT truthful covering up the fact that under questions from the Daily Mail, The Treasury Select Committee never interviewed Jes Staley as should have been part of his appointment procedure.This is also recorded on What Do They Know.

 

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/id_like_a_transcript_or_recordin

 

This confirms further cover ups within the realms of Westminster. Lack of investigation impacts all markets and currency values and pension schemes not just in the UK but Globally.

Case Study four (4) Circa 2006 – Present

Mortgage Securities Fraud- Securitisation Process Fraud.

My name is Bruce Robert Lamb and I’m a Business Analyst and Project Manager and have from 2006 to date brought together a significant amount of data and contacts along with others to identify that all in the UK Government and wider Parliament is NOT as conveyed in the media and totally out of kilter?

I think many know this at heart. On the 16th October 2018 I met with All Party Political Group (APPG) for Banking in Portcullis House, Westminster also my MP Mike Kane, Sale East & Wythenshawe after having brought together a substantial amount of data and connecting intelligence to show the UK economy was being taken down by sources within The Treasury and HMRC.

This meeting was arranged by Kevin Hollinrake MP for Thirsk & Malton an MP linked with APPG Banking. All supporting data was passed to them.

The theft and fraud Id identified had been covered up by design through the FSA then FCA, Police, Economic Crime Groups, Serious Fraud Office and Corporate Accountancy practices supporting the cover up and the HM Treasury/ Government narrative of nothing to see here.

My specific fraud was the identification of a £200 Million bank securities fraud through off plan property, price against delivered product manipulation and property misdescription.

5000 properties roughly £40k overvalued each. This was found through further investigation eventually to be with a view to destabilising the entire UK economy at a later date.

Property valuations in areas were dropping to a fraudulent value created through securities/ contract documents being counterfeit within the banking process. This was by design.

It had the desired effect of placing properties in negative equity UK wide when further investigation with Mortgage Securitisation Claims identified approximately 50% of UK new builds were in the same position late 1990’s to early 2000’s onwards.

Much of the personal data was recorded in Cyclops 1146/12 an investigation closed by GMP and the Serious Fraud Office stating the case was under £1 Million therefore out of scope of investigation.

Through work with Legal Quest on Mortgage Securitisation Claims (MSC) further details on the impact can be found within their website Code TPS100 https://yourmsc.co.uk/

This further linked MSC element when the process is clearly understood creates a theft from the UK public purse of an estimated £1.8 Trillion based on non-payment of Banks funds to HMRC of Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT @ 4%). Thus denying public funds and UK PLC of working capital.

On 16.10.18 Portcullis House, Westminster, Mike Kane was instructed by Heather Buchanan (Exec Director APPG Banking) to ask questions of John Glen The Treasury Minister in the House of Commons, this was after Theresa May in the Commons had already responded to a question set that the regulator (FCA) had enough checks and balances in place to make sure fraud was investigated correctly. The Questions were levelled by Kevin Hollinrake MP. The further questions were to be brought together by myself and conveyed to Mike Kane MP. https://twitter.com/kevinhollinrake/status/1050041387058630658

Theresa Mays response had been a lie as the FSA/ FCA is a protective gate and a revolving door mechanism to The City, witnessed recently with Andrew Bailey ex FCA Gatekeeper moving to The Bank of England Governor position. A Private Bank with Public responsibilities.

On 30.11.18 I met by arrangement Mike Kane MP in his office Wythenshawe to discuss the outline question set for him to ask in The House of Commons of John Glen, Treasury Minister He asked for a recap but I was barely two minutes into this when he stood up and accused me of being a conspiracy theorist and anti-semitic.

2. Dylan Harvey Property Prices were changing values twice on the same day. Sold, then sold again. Over valuations 30-42% in the case studies recorded.

  1. Property Mis-Description and Overvaluation. Knight Frank Survey.

  1. Securities Fraud through Property Mis-Description and Systemic Over Valuation. Taking the UK economy down. NOT investigated by Police or Regulators by design.

 

Covered up at Government/ MP Level. Bank Process in Blue.

The objective of the question set would identify that the UK was being taken down from within economically and covered up within Government Departments under the control of John Glen and his predecessors. The cover up was running deep all the way into Government departments.

The questions were never asked by Mike Kane and now the UK has been taken down economically, through a false pandemic narrative wrecking the UK economy, placing the NHS Ten years behind in operation scheduling confirming my tabled analysis to Kevin Hollinrake and Heather Buchanan.

 

This has been an inside job on taking down the UK economy on the pretence of a pandemic that never took place. Refer to World Doctors Alliance Statement: 30.09.20.

This can be provided for review should you not have an available copy.

http://worlddoctorsalliance.com/

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/high-consequence-infectious-diseases-hcid

WDA Notices:

https://1drv.ms/u/s!ApCwWYmI_p2DhvZMoHZ_PN4tC00a5w?e=da0htu

https://peerlessreads.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/CvFNF_GovtKiller.mp4

Property misdescription against delivered product lead to vast pockets of negative equity UK wide, disrupting the economy and pension schemes not only in the North West but across the UK where this practice was allowed to take place by white collar criminals. Dimensions, Car Park Spaces missing, Property Finishes, 2nd Bathrooms replaced with wardrobes are typical of the delivered product on GAP Analysis.

Photo Booth

Many MPs and Lords are aware this is taking place without investigation but an external force through controlled Politicians are enabling Banks and Secret Societies be they Masonic or Common Purpose aligned, either knowingly or unknowingly to take down the UK economy and commit fraud for personal gain or they are leveraged by financial, photographic or have paedophile network alliances. Treason is being committed.

Analysis completed specifically for the Lloyds Fraud(s) investigations to date have been undertaken by the Action 4 Justice team. The Framework documents linked “The Wetiko Investigation and Matrix” from intelligence gathered show the clear links between Common Purpose, Westminster’s MP’s PM’s over decades and the Banking sector. The Mind Map (Page 14) presented covers 20% roughly of the intelligence held by their own Business Analysts and Investigators. Others Banks intelligence available on request. This white collar fraud network extends into most UK Councils, Police Forces, Westminster and The City. Documents linked via hyperlinks in PDF format:  Wetiko Matrix: https://bit.ly/3nHFHHF Dr Konstantine Mettenheim: https://bit.ly/2GPusfJ

Case Study five (5) Circa 2000 – Present

Example of Sovereignty Erosion. UN Direct Intervention with UK Local Councils &

Telecommunications Operators

The involvement of local government direct UK wide implementing United Nations sustainable development goals is directly linked to the fraudulent leverage placed on local councils and compromised parties early 2000’s onward with LOBO loans.

 

These loans were operated under a bait and switch tactic which has seen up to 70% of local council funding going directly into interest payments.

 

Banking institutions leveraged the situation through fraudulent contracts going in with low interest rates and then switching the rate through a tactical approach written into the Lender Option Borrower Option contracts. This we can confirm when studying other financial malpractice matters.

 

Banks don’t lend money they manage securities, further detail by County Council would be in their contracts but a general explanation is provided by Ian Fraser on his website.

It would appear that the European Union and United Nations have directly brokered or contracted with Local Councils and Authorities across the UK, participating in the Act of Treason.

 

Effectively waging war through technology based installations 5G and LED Street lighting the length and breadth of the United Kingdom.

 

“Blue light” of LED streetlights linked to breast and prostate cancer

The “blue light” emitted by street lights including LEDs, and commercial outdoor lighting such as advertising, is linked to a significant increase in the risk of breast and prostate cancer, innovative new research has concluded.

https://www.exeter.ac.uk/news/featurednews/title_655460_en.html

 

Further investigation by an independent team of which parties are directly involved is required and a RACI exercise completed for each UK Council where the false narrative has been extended to the UK public across all media types. RACI – Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, Informed. 5G LED Street Lighting Slide Deck – Mark Steele linked. https://bit.ly/3cZfCil 

 

Huawei Whistle Blower Confirmation 5G is a Weapons System and Can Be placed in “Attack Mode”. Why would a telecommunications system need a Beam Forming “Attack Mode” attribute?

 

Analysis on Output Power – Evidence. https://bit.ly/3dbsVfR

IEEE Confirmation of Kill Grid Functionality Built into strategic positioning of Masts, Antennae & Confirmation that a population would need to be injected with a “Resonance Enhancer”.

5G Huawei Whistle blower. 8/10/20: Huawei 5G - Attack Targets – Functionality

Case Study Six (6) Circa 2000 – Present

Len Lawrence Ex Royal Navy Pilot, Ex BAE Pilot. Toxic Fumes in BAE cabins. Judicial Cover Ups and Property Theft.

Len’s story and case may be reaching its final stages as ex forces staff who now work for the Met Police did not like to see injustice done to someone who had served his country. They provided hidden intelligence to support his earlier claims. This case study demonstrates the levels of cover up that can impact many and the lengths some will take to try and silence those who have been harmed through corporate failings or admissions of guilt. Watching Len’s video interview with Caroline Stephen’s details events and the expose’ of Judge Simon Oliver involvement in taking bribes to sway decisions within the legal system.

 

The series of events around Simon Oliver been recorded on the website

https://judgesbehavingbadlyblog.wordpress.com/

https://1drv.ms/u/s!ApCwWYmI_p2DhvEu8HS61Yq5eyfrhg?e=GhQoBQ

Through a series of events leading to a cabin breach by organic petroleum derivatives which impacted Lens central nervous system and that of other pilot’s historically a series of events and industry/ corporate denials lead to loss of his marriage, property, assets and his welfare. Linked information and the slides below briefly tell the tale of the suffering this man has had to endure to begin to get his life back. Justice needs to be done.

 

*The abuse of court of protection protocols is especially grievous, wherein exclusionary mental health legislation is used in order to side line and even silence those with views that would seek actively to expose corruption, in order to achieve vital, systemic redress. We note similar changes now under the Coronavirus legislation, intended to make it so that only one psychiatrist is required, instead of two, in order to confirm mental capacity – making it easier still (removing checks and balances inbuilt) which would militate against abuses of power and creation/manipulation of regulations to prejudice the rights of those seeking remedy, by stripping them of all their rights to a voice and justice. This is abominable and is yet more evidence of a truly inhumane system, using power to protect special interests from any culpability for their conduct, destroying lives of ordinary men and women, to secure the status of ‘above the law’ (which no mortal, not even the monarch, can truly be).

 

For having the positive audacity to research who was behind attempting to persuade him NOT to investigate the crime against him. Some unknown party decided to make him homeless yet again.

 

To what lengths are those who run the Justice system prepared to go to cover up white collar criminals?

Case Study Seven (7) Circa 2012 – Present

Private Motor Insurance Fraud. (Estimated £3 Billion/PA.)

 

 

 

 

 

Identified by mark of the Clann wyschna. As previously disclosed in letters to your Constabulary 006 001 & to your Police Fire & Crime Commissionaire 006 002.

 

The Government have facilitated the creation of an Extortion Racket for the benefit of the General Insurer operating within the Private Motor Insurance Market through sect 143 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 & the removal of the territorial Constabularies in England & Wales Fraud Function and its centralization within the privately funded City of London Police Constabulary.

 

The Fraud openly breaches around 10 of the 11 Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) Key Principles for Business something the FCA themselves accept as ‘a serious issue’ FCA complaint 206366951

The Fraud is facilitated through a referral question unfairly incentivising an inferior product, to remove the Insurers lawfully contracted obligation to indemnify the consumer in the event of a non-fault road traffic collision, that removes the insurance principal of subrogation and therefore requirement for loss mitigation, to aggrandise the Insurer through the creation of an illegitimate revenue stream at both there consumers expense & seeing massive unlawful increases in premiums.

 

A clear understanding of the fraud is outlined in both the Competition & Marketing Authority Private Motor Insurance Investigation Final Report, & the Association of British Insurers General Terms Agreement Technical Committee Protocols, which when examined with the minutes from various meetings, clearly suggests that senior ministers inc the Attorney General & members of the FSA predecessor to the FCA may have conspired &/or connived with the General Insurers.

 

There is suggestion of Bribery & Corruption within the City of London Police who are privately funded from within the City of London, and whose own Insurance Fraud Enforcement Department receive funding from the General Insurers Trade Organisation the Association of British Insurers.

 

The FCA are currently investigating the allegation unsupervised despite this total failure of regulation leaving them clearly liable for the indictable Misconduct in public office at Common Law along with potentially Conspiracy to commit fraud at Common Law.

 

To add insult to the considerable loss suffered already, the FCA are claiming they cannot share the results of their investigation due to legislation.

 

Due to the blocks and buffers by the “Official Public Authorities” I had strong suspicions there would be many, many more such schemes in place, which led me to meeting the investigator of the 4th Case Study.

Remedy

 

We are required by Royal Command to compel you once again to stand under common law with the Committee of Barons who lawfully invoked Article 61 of MC1215 on the 23rd March 2001.

 

You are required to uphold the law of the land and therefore launch investigations and prosecute as evidence dictates the list of seven case studies within this document.

 

Allowing for a reasonable time frame for you to respond to this “Notice of Obligation According To English Constitutional Law” I hereby offer you this further chance to rebut or confirm my understanding of the common law as referred to in my previous Notice(s) so that you may remain in honour, and thus by doing so enabling an opportunity to remedy this matter by law, amicably so as to save any future breach of the peace or torts being committed.
 

We hereby attest and affirm that all of the above is the truth and as to our lawful understanding.

Without malice, vexation, frivolity or ill will, and on our full personal commercial liability and penalty of perjury and, with no admission of liability whatsoever and with all our natural, indefeasible and unalienable Common law rights intact.

 

 

For & on behalf of the people of the United Kingdom & Northern Ireland

 

Sworn and subscribed on the date: www.we-the-people.co.uk/

Appendix 1

 

’I....................of....................do solemnly and sincerely declare and affirm that I will well and truly serve the Queen in the office of constable, with fairness, integrity, diligence and impartiality, upholding fundamental human rights and according equal respect to all people; and that I will, to the best of my power, cause the peace to be kept and preserved and prevent all offences against people and property; and that while I continue to hold the said office I will, to the best of my skill and knowledge, discharge all the duties thereof faithfully according to law.’

 

Appendix 2

 

In the Coronation ceremony of 2 June 1953, one of the highlights was when The Queen made her Coronation Oath (taken from the Order of Service for the Coronation).

 

The Queen having returned to her Chair, (her Majesty having already on Tuesday, the 4th day of November, 1952, in the presence of the two Houses of Parliament, made and signed the Declaration prescribed by Act of Parliament), the Archbishop standing before her shall administer the Coronation Oath, first asking the Queen,

Madam, is your Majesty willing to take the Oath?

And the Queen answering,

I am willing.

The Archbishop shall minister these questions; and The Queen, having a book in her hands, shall answer each question severally as follows:

Archbishop. Will you solemnly promise and swear to govern the Peoples of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the Union of South Africa, Pakistan, and Ceylon, and of your Possessions and the other Territories to any of them belonging or pertaining, according to their respective laws and customs?

Queen. I solemnly promise so to do.

Archbishop. Will you to your power cause Law and Justice, in Mercy, to be executed in all your judgements?

Queen. I will.

Archbishop. Will you to the utmost of your power maintain the Laws of God and the true profession of the Gospel? Will you to the utmost of your power maintain in the United Kingdom the Protestant Reformed Religion established by law? Will you maintain and preserve inviolably the settlement of the Church of England, and the doctrine, worship, discipline, and government thereof, as by law established in England? And will you preserve unto the Bishops and Clergy of England, and to the Churches there committed to their charge, all such rights and privileges, as by law do or shall appertain to them or any of them?

Queen. All this I promise to do.

Then the Queen arising out of her Chair, supported as before, the Sword of State being carried before her, shall go to the Altar, and make her solemn Oath in the sight of all the people to observe the premisses: laying her right hand upon the Holy Gospel in the great Bible (which was before carried in the procession and is now brought from the Altar by the Arch-bishop, and tendered to her as she kneels upon the steps), and saying these words:

The things which I have here before promised, I will perform and keep. So help me God.

Then the Queen shall kiss the Book and sign the Oath.

The Queen having thus taken her Oath shall return again to her Chair, and the Bible shall be delivered to the Dean of Westminster.

 

Appendix 3

 

Types of Fundamental Human Rights

  1. The right to life

  2. The right to dignity of persons

  3. Right to freedom of speech

  4. Right to freedom of association

  5. The right to fair hearing

  6. The right to freedom of movement

  7. The right from freedom of discrimination

  8. The right to personal liberty

  9. The right to vote and be voted for during an election

  10. The right to private family life

  11. Right to ownership of properties

 

Appendix 4

 

The current wording of the Parliamentary Oath is prescribed by section 1 of the Oaths Act 1978. The usual wording of the oath is thus:

 

I swear by Almighty God that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth, her heirs and successors, according to law. So help me God.

 

The wording of the solemn affirmation, as set out in the Oaths Act 1978, is:

 

 I do solemnly, sincerely, and truly declare and affirm, That I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth, her heirs and successors, according to law.2

 

Appendix 5

https://www.parliament.uk/about/living-heritage/evolutionofparliament/originsofparliament/birthofparliament/overview/magnacarta/magnacartaclauses/

Appendix 6

 

https://magnacartaplus.org/magnacarta/

Appendix 7

Article 61 – Magna Carta – Lawful Rebellion

 

Download: Oath of Allegiance

© 2020 by Project Elephant